|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 9, 2013 9:49:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 9, 2013 9:50:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 9, 2013 9:52:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 9, 2013 9:37:10 GMT -5
- The (rest of the ) women approach the grave
- Two angels tell them about the resurrection
- The women run off to report to the men
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 5, 2015 8:58:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:55:39 GMT -5
Hn
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:58:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:58:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:59:15 GMT -5
MARK'S CONCLUSION"The two oldest manuscripts of Mark 16 (from the 300s) conclude with verse 8 [...] Many scholars take 16:8 as the original ending and believe the longer ending (16:9-20) was a later addition." - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16"Clement of Alexandria and Origen [early third century] show no knowledge of the existence of these verses; furthermore Eusebius and Jerome attest that the passage was absent from almost all Greek copies of Mark known to them.” - A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Bruce Metzger, professor Emeritus of New Testament Language and Literature at Princeton Theological Seminary, 2005, p.123 "we can accept the passage [was] not an original portion of St. Mark’s Gospel" - Sir Frederic Kenyon1951, p. 174 “ [The Longer conclusion] may well be from the beginning of the second century” - Aland and Aland, 1987, pp. 69,227 “The inference therefore seems to me to be, that it [was] placed as a completion of the Gospel in very early times: by whom written, must of course remain wholly uncertain" Henry Alford, textual critic Mark 16:9-10. Now begins the apocryphal fragment of some other evangelical treatise (doubtless written very much in the way of epitome), which has been added as a conclusion of our Gospel." Meyer's New Testament Commentary biblehub.com/commentaries/mark/16-9.htm counter argument: www.bible-researcher.com/endmark.html#dissent"In one sense, their work has been unnecessary, since the vast majority of textual variants involve minor matters that do not affect doctrine as it relates to one’s salvation. Even those variants that might be deemed doctrinally significant pertain to matters that are treated elsewhere in the Bible where the question of genuineness is unobscured. No feature of Christian doctrine is at stake. Variant readings in existing manuscripts do not alter any basic teaching of the New Testament." apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=704
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:59:30 GMT -5
MARKS CONCLUSION
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 4:59:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 5:01:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 5:02:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 5:02:12 GMT -5
|
|
