|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 18, 2017 2:33:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 18, 2017 2:34:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 18, 2017 2:38:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 18, 2017 2:39:05 GMT -5
xx
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 18, 2017 5:43:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:44:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:47:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:47:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:48:07 GMT -5
In short to what extent and at what point do you intend to "take away people's will"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:49:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:53:01 GMT -5
Fv
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:53:15 GMT -5
1) Does this mean the Bible denies man is a beast? Yes. In the bible, man is catagorized as human (mankind) not as "beasts". 2) Does this mean God didn't know a male species of the genus Hominid needed a female to reproduce? No. If we are to presume the existence of God as the creator of the animal kingdom, he would also be by definition the designer and creator of all procreative systems; in view of this it seems logical to conclude God knew how reproduction worked. If God had designed and created Adam with reproductive organs he would have known that that if reproduction to be possible he (Adam) would need a female (human) equivalent. 3) Did God really parade all the animals past Adam to see if he was turned on by any of them? No. The bible account says that the purpose of God bringing the animals to Adam was to name them. It makes no statement that suggests that he (God) wanted Adam to have sex with them or was experimenting to see if Adam was sexually attracted to any of the worms, snakes, butterflies or elephants etc that he would have to name. Further, if the bible account is to believed, it was God himself that designed and created Adam with his physical and sexual make-up, so He (God) would have been perfectly aware that humans (short of mental malfunction or moral perversion) are not normally sexually attracted to animals, rendering such an "experiment" to find out whether this was the case, pointless. God's law was also later to absolutely prohibit bestiality (sexual contact with animals) indicative one can reasonably presume, of how God feels about that particular perversion. God would later voice his desire that humans reproduce and "fill the earth" with their offspring (children), suggesting one of the purposes of sex is to reproduce; sex with animals could not contribute to the fulfillment of that divine purpose. Thus there is no reason to presume that God's instruction that Adam name the animals was an invitation to have sex with them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:53:28 GMT -5
Gb
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 13:55:47 GMT -5
|
|
